Manchester City have officially appointed Enzo Maresca as Pep Guardiola's successor after a dramatic managerial saga. However, his arrival has reignited tensions with former club Chelsea over his controversial departure.
The Italian has apologised publicly for the disruption caused during his Stamford Bridge exit. Meanwhile, Chelsea (2.21) have released an extraordinary statement explaining their version of events and confirming compensation agreements involving both Manchester City and Maresca.
Chelsea Release Explosive Statement Over Maresca Exit
Manchester City confirmed Maresca as their new head coach on a three-year contract. His appointment comes less than seven months after leaving Chelsea in difficult circumstances. The move follows Guardiola's departure from the Etihad Stadium. Chelsea responded immediately with a strongly worded statement outlining their frustration over the events leading to Maresca's exit.
According to Sky Sports News, City will pay Chelsea £17 million in compensation. Maresca also agreed to a separate confidential settlement with his former club. Chelsea believe his departure significantly contributed to their disappointing 2025/26 campaign. Consequently, the club decided to publicly explain the situation after months of speculation.
The statement revealed Chelsea first became aware during autumn 2025 that Maresca believed he could eventually replace Guardiola. Club officials claimed they quickly realised his ambition to manage Manchester City had become his overwhelming priority despite having several years remaining on his contract, and they argued this ultimately affected his commitment to Chelsea during a crucial stage of the season.
Chelsea Explain Why Trust Broke Down
Chelsea described Maresca's resignation in December as unexpected and deeply disappointing. Club executives believed they had invested heavily in a long-term project. Instead, they suddenly found themselves searching for another manager midway through the season.
The statement read: "In autumn last year, the club was informed by our former head coach [Maresca] that there might be an opportunity for him to succeed Pep Guardiola at the end of the season.
"It became clear to us that it was his strong desire to succeed Guardiola and that he was fully committed to pursuing the opportunity, despite the fact he was under a long-term contract which he had no right to terminate.
"In December 2025, our head coach unexpectedly and abruptly resigned from his position. Obviously, we felt let down as we believed that his head and heart were focused on another club and another opportunity, despite having just arrived at Chelsea the year before."
Chelsea later appointed Liam Rosenior following Maresca's departure. Nevertheless, Rosenior lasted only 106 days before being dismissed. The club eventually finished 10th in the Premier League and failed to qualify for European competition, highlighting how costly the managerial instability proved throughout the campaign.
Maresca Issues Public Apology
Following his appointment at Manchester City, Maresca addressed Chelsea supporters on Instagram. He accepted responsibility for the circumstances surrounding his departure. Furthermore, he insisted the decision belonged solely to him.
He wrote: "The decision was only mine. My resignation from Chelsea opened a path for me to join Manchester City, which is a club I knew very well. I am ecstatic that I have now joined Manchester City.
"I recognise that my departure from Chelsea in the middle of the season caused disruption for the club and I apologise for that. It was neither my intention nor my wish."
His apology arrived shortly after Chelsea's statement became public. Even so, many supporters remain divided over whether his explanation sufficiently addresses the controversy.
Manchester City's Interest Changed Everything
Sky Sports News reported Chelsea reluctantly allowed Maresca to speak with Manchester City once they became aware of the interest. However, permission reportedly came with strict conditions. The expectation was that any move would only happen during the summer and only if Guardiola decided to leave.
Instead, events unfolded much faster than anticipated. Chelsea concluded they could no longer retain a manager whose focus had shifted elsewhere. Reports suggesting Maresca had become unhappy at Stamford Bridge emerged throughout the season. However, Chelsea insist his primary motivation was always the opportunity to return to Manchester City.
His previous relationship with Guardiola strengthened City's interest considerably. Maresca had served as Guardiola's assistant during City's historic treble-winning campaign. Therefore, many viewed him as the natural successor once Guardiola decided to step aside.
Results and Relationships Declined at Stamford Bridge
Maresca began his Chelsea reign with considerable optimism after arriving in June 2024. During October, Chelsea occupied ninth place and remained within touching distance of the Premier League's top five. Despite that encouraging position, internal tensions gradually increased.
Relationships reportedly deteriorated between the head coach and several figures inside the club. Poor performances added further pressure. Public disagreements with the media also attracted unwanted attention. Moreover, reported disputes involving Chelsea's medical department created additional instability behind the scenes.
Following a 2-0 victory over Everton in December, Maresca surprised journalists by describing his previous two days as the worst since arriving at Chelsea. He also suggested "many people didn't support us". Afterwards, he repeatedly declined opportunities to clarify those comments, increasing speculation about his future.
Chelsea Had Little Choice
Chelsea confirmed Maresca's departure on New Year's Day. Sky Sports News reported the Italian believed his position had become untenable. By that stage, Chelsea had managed only one victory from their previous seven Premier League matches. The poor run left them 15 points behind eventual champions Arsenal.
His final match ended in a 2-2 home draw against Bournemouth. During that contest, supporters loudly criticised one substitution involving Cole Palmer. The atmosphere reflected growing frustration among the fanbase as performances continued to decline.
Chelsea's statement explained why the club accepted his resignation.
It said: "No club wants to change its head coach midway through a season.
"However, in light of his decision not to continue fulfilling his responsibilities through to the end of the season, the club was left with no choice but to protect our players, our supporters, and the badge and accept his resignation."
Compensation Brings the Saga to an End
Once Guardiola's departure became official, Maresca quickly emerged as the overwhelming favourite to replace him. Even so, negotiations between Chelsea and Manchester City reportedly continued for several weeks. Lawyers from both clubs worked to resolve the financial implications before the appointment could finally be completed.
Chelsea confirmed that confidential settlements had been reached with both Manchester City and Maresca. As a result, the legal dispute has now been resolved without further escalation. Nevertheless, the emotional wounds may take considerably longer to heal after one of the Premier League's most dramatic managerial departures in recent years, particularly because Chelsea believe the disruption fundamentally damaged their campaign while Manchester City now hope Maresca can continue the remarkable success established by Guardiola.
Although attention will now shift towards City's future under Maresca, Chelsea supporters are unlikely to forget the circumstances surrounding his departure anytime soon. The episode also serves as another reminder of how quickly managerial situations can change at the highest level of the game, while discussions surrounding the Premier League continue to dominate headlines and even influence interest in online sports betting platforms such as Easybet, who offer a 150% deposit match with terms and conditions applicable.